
Cook v Deeks
1916 · [1916] 1 AC 554 (PC)
Posted By lanbuk.com
- Facts
- Three of the four directors negotiated a construction contract on behalf of the company but took it for themselves. As majority shareholders they then passed a resolution that the company had no interest in it.
- Issue
- Could the majority ratify the diversion of the contract?
- Held
- No. The contract belonged in equity to the company, and the majority could not make a present to themselves of the company's property.
- Principle
- A majority cannot ratify its own appropriation of company property; this is fraud on the minority.
- Why it matters
- It is the classic fraud on the minority case.
For study only. By lanbuk.com. Always check current sources and consult a qualified professional.
