
Adams v Cape Industries plc
1990 · [1990] Ch 433 (CA)
Posted By lanbuk.com
- Facts
- Claimants who had won judgments in Texas for asbestos injuries tried to enforce them in England against Cape, the English parent of a group with a US marketing subsidiary.
- Issue
- Was Cape present in the United States through its subsidiary, so the judgments could be enforced?
- Held
- No. The Court of Appeal refused to treat the group as a single economic unit, found no agency, and held the structure was not a mere facade. Using a group so that future liabilities fall on a subsidiary is legitimate.
- Principle
- The court will not lift the veil merely because justice seems to require it or because companies form a group.
- Why it matters
- It is the leading authority against the single economic unit argument.
For study only. By lanbuk.com. Always check current sources and consult a qualified professional.
