
R v Secretary of State for the Home Department, ex parte Doody
1993 · [1994] 1 AC 531
Posted By lanbuk.com
- Facts
- Prisoners serving life sentences for murder were not told the judges' advice on their minimum terms or the reasons for the terms set.
- Issue
- Did fairness require disclosure and reasons?
- Held
- Yes. They were entitled to know the gist of the judges' views, to make representations, and to be given reasons.
- Principle
- Lord Mustill: what fairness demands depends on the context. A person should usually be told the gist of the case against him.
- Why it matters
- A leading statement of the content of fairness and of reasons.
For study only. By lanbuk.com. Always check current sources and consult a qualified professional.
