Sierra Leone Oxygen Factor Limited v P.B Pyne-Bailey (CIV APP 1 of 1973) [1974] SLSC 5 (10 May 1974)

i oo ‘Di vig! SUPIasa: CouRY OF ST.autA |.cON? B civ. ner. 73 \ 6 4 BR sierra Leone oxygen Dnotory Limited — Plaintsffo/appellanta Coir 3 4 Rein ‘ ae dchg Dk oe ee, aI ‘agp aig pant cotsnenne enti ay inthe Toes ao i ~ ae “5 ate } Ah Brome-Karke, J.540. — ‘hin appoa is frou tio jul:nont of the sda e re © LI eyo eet it ona ny Oy es enn oe gg | RIBS: Onder of “tse 1sh court dated 30th tovender, is “ordering that 45g eis, Ea haere) i) AURIS acnont tn date of aipoacanon obtained on the 4th day of ne, nese? ne , ibe. cot aside, H Be De | oa ot i) oa | S| See eeeenrereen errr: Fi Wie Stitenont of Clain-ant dated the 24th day of March, 1971, ‘he appollinta «ceed 4) | S| eaeines on the ease es cannons for teach of sntract ant for wrongs... Jed [| aye . Ce Same tat HIME detention of goods. In,the atatonont of claim aicmed ty their feusetten ee ad id | Bea ouster oa ty | a HM) tho a2pe2ionte alioced the following! i tae oe i hg “2°. pase Teese SSG gM ROn ek about the-26th. gay of Ootobor, 1969 the defamiant colresged \ EH i: EMR: ? exoactho Praaneicr for’ nivinding ono’(1) 05 Ikvue Tovar dtecteney saetin, Ba fay FHA.» ToterNe. 027490 nate ty iwurfoo-Bassi of Nila: in 1965 which the ge tse EE AGH». -pogepdengjexanined and 0,z00d to rewind at the sun or cont of ai a Mad LY} sgl 8 1Ono.ithoubnd three jundrod and fifty loonos (J.c«1,350.00). Sho damiens A a Ld] © Piingitt yada to’ tho Defondant Yo whole gf tho tu of La.2 350,00 put gear | abo BE ce i : “RRB secereanantig <GMeg <> 2.. Tt woo an implica torm.ot the contract tut tho machine youldueMpiaei eel at | ie Be properly and efficiontly re-vound and the lofgndcnt upliedly Mimi etametal | “J HAR <xeprovonted cot hold out £0 tbe Pleintits that he-hed the neoqpesie ieee | GHA * okt31 eg Imovedge to do a6. : EM aRaee eeaeD : SeeRa : ty ey SHETEAL Age, te motor wo boing wood at the Plaintictts prenieoe in the 2) alata see LAAG Saatersertreconyom sat tau waojor he eosenoe of the contrac} ge UA GMA Ag. kttor oonciderabis dotay and in easly 1970, tho Dotontait aR fay" Telumed the motor to tie Pleintift, but the vork had bean sot geReteyie war Bie inttficiently carriojvovt that the inductor wire vould not even fia es a! Ef” 35 te he te cd fhe motor wae usable, “ste Hatneisr Shere eet! 01 pre 3) ‘mon forthwith informed the Defendant who after a few daya., 60 Yh Dla i j tf inopgoted the.notor ant oubsequently collected it for remwiiainge.! 4 feceimed |) + cyl ee om 4 dae) vi. a HAs 25,0 STL the set kaguat, 1970, the vofendant seisnen NSERC |) SAW TG, “Meppaired thethoter nor gofundad the au of Lo.1,350 notwithotandl aga eel MGM p>: iPoverel requesta ty: the Maintitt for the defcadant to do ao¥ eee 5 ij ei es Sit. SN a ‘ cheapaaaaess tenet TAL AL 4 Ger Tn tho: rocult the Plaintife indirrod cofsiderable: lowe wlio eetn apsceets | SEAL Fo, paohine yao in the postosvion of the Lefendant and had to 4iameay mma gf gl, . -Porise e zeplacenpnt sotor to enable 4+ to execute ite contrectaegy Beamemtaa lll Pi a on , i ‘. Prep cS AL]. ‘te Flaintitt hes suffered 1600 and damage $hoieby. in| 5h Pa al ae) on. 3 Rat) a : be ae y " “DeNiiaba ons CS bee F eS | on - . es i eee eS i ne is ee ar se

4 é oe, = i"

ot

7. On or about the 19th day of dusust, 19/0, the motor was | * q collected ty the Plaistict ant repaired iy atothar Tice wt the By cout of Le.5ad, 4 Jantiqulars of Love and yume if 4 ‘ =

(0) Gost of obteinin snother wotor en 5S a | SY (b) Tons of Sate of manufactured vroducth: 1,506.00 8" j E | 2, the Plaintife therefore elaiua: aE Ihe aa

(2) Speciat cava, ou of Lowk 50.00 7 2 af | Be a.

(2) A vetund of the depoott of 12.1,350000 als os aod the Plaintitt olaind general damagéo, ia haa (ER, a acrsaavst of corvice ovorn ty env David Losch on 11th Janey 1971 ode ba BE) pacts stats ote or bamona sa carve on ti ipo at nae’ 2 ed ibe Sox motu ster Dginoring Ageico, 1, Fab tod, reectomt co ‘ ae: 2 3 ‘the 25th March, 1971. ‘the saJd David Honoh awore to a second affidavit. , He v4 PPE. ooncth on iim tind auto's etaton thet'so avpearnioe bad een extoroa HP OOF w orca tin of nonenid, re BAe? dndomnt tn dtinat wiv obtained an to part of tha clain on 14th ney? | BE ifs, sirue.2, 10.00, camer tn by worried ent ciao ect oe oe 4 a GFF jcnda mu schon Wy be: shia Toshmg tasted ied uecintne, AL "So the stu tay of October) 197d, tid tatsoster tor tac srpentante mate Mba Ee ‘a syplioation for a lirit of Piers Mocias endorsed to lewy ta.5,050.60 ‘and : a I i a Gee sstoroot therdon ut the rate of Losin jer cont ger comm ao from uth i be Ys Feo, 2972, te Doty Navter ant rosietrar elined the voit of Hert Hotes ae Bc inet ttn ant tector to ty evaton forts 030. —— ae ee a (5. BONES Of notdon aitod 2nd Hoveudor,: 1971, lire I. 0, Mackay soatide f z| le fo 46 484 ten Oourt on tehair of %e Hospcadent 0, an Onder thut the Set Fi Ha [oF 8 sores ot tpuarance dated tho eth ay of Jn, 190, bo wet aati he [Ef stab themanter ett sor srs in on te arias El My E Fp of the Neopdndett: orn on thg’bane date. Tarthor that the dtatvannd eae ? Gf ine si2s8Lt8d ty the espendent be Fited sat served on the sort es oa leet AS souoiar. °°, 2 ‘ es ee hs. esas ila

Eye] oe 3 | to apoléeasion ea: u. berore hon anwing, Js on 5th Kovonber, 2572, | but ry Tackay on behal? of Koupondent/Apalicant requested an aAjourmont on she sound that ¢ ws: short served, the uljonmed date vas Sth Yovenbor, Be. 1ST, on whsoh date Ye. tarousJona apronred Zor Anpollanta/tespendente i ote and ia, Hackay on bohalf of toi: ondent/Applic. nt. ee After teasing Cossoe for Woth yartios ant reading the affutaetf ted 4 EO PRMD 2 wus ort she snpttcant/toscontent the ax:-ldeation vas rofued. “oo 1 ap 2 [EAM wongapn wa mado of the iateuost of vetonce vitich’ wa exhibited, ' i ea On 10th Beverber, 18/1) kr, tackay entered an appearance in the aster!» i] IESE crtice on voniat of to taavondent. Un tho une date ne filéd another notice = Wed 3 9 a5 (pfs ote Toran Onder that for she reneona chown in the affidavit éfithe = i Sti E bBeW eopontont/ayptioant wafely wae aloo filed, the “wit of Hierd Yacias and the $i. Be is 4 ST UEHES tote vroceedings be set aude on the ground of isreqlarity. “g et a On spe 12th cay of Novenber, 2972, before “ojan, Je, Tir. ogerantright See ‘3 5 ¢ S Ue YP with tr. Mackay erpeared on dohalf of Rou-ondout/Ajylicant’” Counsed for 4 Byte PRPIRS | tovetiaate/vespondents redund w prelininary ébjection that the notion wae : FARR onort served and ween, 34) oniévod an interim stay: of oxooxtion of the wit ae : | Ee TAME or viert vaoiue. . x co. they © 20th Moyeaber, 15/7, the sald motion og Wefore jun, J.) aad attor j <2 UR BABY” hoaring Counso. for both vurtieu, the learned judge ruled a follower cea SE Lave connidoroa chuw evyswonti-of bith Counsel. ‘dhore do no . FI eaeg mud a breach of tbe niles hay bseu eos sed, in tho intorest “a ames of Justice, I allow ito ayplic.tion to net aide the Jud ments . ‘ll art Vorto in the ewice, A 2 On TUth Mocender, 1671, vojan, Je .zantod an apy-Lseation ty Counsel ai , ol eae : Bi TIRE! for Arvottente/aoviscante fer résio to aypeat i.alnot the interlocutory ree | oe Gf cent ot the BOL Yonder, 1971. ‘Sm asrAioction ww expvoricd be ‘ i (Os i ae BHAI accisarts morn ty we woicttor for ippitiaat on ten recension Sea chee - SR Pept ‘The (ound, of apy;oal as recorded was fee a rel Baie 34 -.: as . » ee ed Beale: ws the Learned vial Judco had no*juriadiction to watortain’ aa SSE fe Noopendent 1a llotice of motion dated 101i Hovenber, 1971, a Sei SYSMEE - by ronson of tho fact that on the Sth day of Hovenber, 1971, dial. sail Sa "the High Colurt of sierra Toone by an order af the Hon! hee t+ Seaman || Se Justice Kon 0, ‘During had dimitoned a vimilur application madé ie een ol i ig] the Hotioe of notion dated 2nd lovenber, IS Ti, whieh neta fh Bets all Seng order renaing in full force and effect," cra ieee || ie et : Eee ee ss | sued Po tea eb ag ’ A eS I Bee .- ae

ri iia he ee re | m1? ae & La se agpeat wea board eth terre Leone Oonrt of Anal on 2g a jr 25th tay, 1972. hp. Judgeent of the Court Wole, Cy J., suing and davies | | Ju/k) was a8 foliowe:~ a | ‘iy the intoraut of Je:rtico ue foel that tho matter svmda tt al go to trial, slo Viezecore Anvol our overs: under Inde 36 ; { Of the Couré of Ayveal Inilon tnd dicnive the appeul. tle afaw order as to cost. ‘ jf Covawel for Appetiansg,fp: Lied to tut Court for luave to «peal from tte te Be = f.. dudguont of 25th Kay, 1972 dtumtousn; the a poe) of -A;,cllaxty, Conditional ioe e : is “ig leave to appeal to to Su,reme Court vac given on 30th Yune, 1972 and Fined } st FPS roove on 13eh Suny, 1972. The 3 ae A ag (4) tat sre jud-went of Yen Dining Jey of Yt Luvonbor, : i ot 1971, vax veclar and that the Tigi Court in : Bee i exercising; it undoubted discretion found no werit ie a 4n tho appliction to set it avide und properly eid ‘| a refused ioave to the hoapondent to defond action. EB ie ‘het inthe cirousutmeen a further application to ee me: the sage tribunal vas inay-vopriate and untenable” bd ae excert ly uay @f leave to apal. 4) oe Pa | GA) what ihe efroct of the Onder of Hejah; J.j wan to 3 En ovorue tic duotaton of son wiring, Je, atthonc the b ce Hampondento' Uounsol had’ grecitical!. Stated thet tt oe ag ‘ia u motion sor an order to aet aide, Jul,jent i ome obtained on 2éth Jime, S71, on the souls ef es ah frroulurity. : Bs ite ae ; oo aa Le that the roma fie. tere, Adardey aldeied with es: ae respect to t4 judiont of icth June, 1972, wore ’ til fees igs noither et uit in the motion gated uth lovenber, fe tie 1971, av recvined by Urdor 50 ilo J, nor >ao any ia ie. slow fn 0 socueataof Comal, nor my apeoitied ard aa By Wojan, Je, am jwtifying hiv order to tet auide, * mee bo (444) ‘hat the renedy, 4f any, open tothe Respondent wad to Hs iu pe es apply fore utay of the Urit of Piuei Paoiay (Onder 30 Ae eeeo EE eas ; (62) or to apeal™to toe Gourt of Appeci frou the | /.2"ReRe AAS BM PA ea Order of During, J. ers xe . ea ewe | ek 3 | a (29) stat, judeoo of ecuet juiseatctin doula not reverse Sele ata San each’ other wheter on a water involving exercise je" HEN EY Me BE acarene -<oc--0f dnoretion or otierwiua. oagge LE Re 1 fer Appellants subus i 5h NS Ef fae he 2 48 er oes We lee el [Mist-alneo the appen} bofore it was fro the jude hget wale Hy Re Baer St goat ov orders of Yojany Joy the Court of ayant” “cen «nue 1A MBI Ba Gould not properly or validly havo exerotood ito watak oot AER as pavers under tule 36 of the Court of Appeal Inloo. BCS oH a i ; 36. eae 3 * ' guar feat Bite be E. aor Ut ae isa dee. one. BE ee Bp ae a el

The pages read for this report end here. The judgment continues in the PDF.