
Miscellaneous application
Ssemanda John and Others (Miscellaneous Application No. 2 of 2026) [2026] UGHC 1109 (29 May 2026)
Ssemanda John and Others is a miscellaneous application from Uganda on 29 May 2026. Cite it as [2026] UGHC 1109. Search it by the party names, the citation [2026] UGHC 1109, or Uganda miscellaneous application.
UgandaPDF · 720 KB[2026] UGHC 1109Miscellaneous application
May 29, 2026
UGANDA
Ssemanda John and Others
Appellant
Miscellaneous Application No. 2 of 2026
[2026] UGHC 1109
Proceeding. Miscellaneous application. Uganda.
1 | Page
THE REPUBLIC OF UGANDA
IN THE HIGH COURT OF UGANDA HOLDEN AT WAKISO
MISCELLANEOUS APPLICATION NO. 002 OF 2026
(Arising from HCT-AC-NO. 568 OF 2018)
1. SSEMANDA JOHN ::::::::::::: APPLICANTS
2. MAYANJA KAMBUGU MATIA
3. NAKAZIBWE CISSY
(Administrators of the Estate
of the late KAFUMA MATIA)
BEFORE: HON. LADY JUSTICE DR. GRACE FLAVIA LAMUNO
RULING
The Applicants brought this Application by Notice of Motion under
Sections 96 and 98 of the Civil Procedure Act Cap 282, Section 37 of
the Judicature Act Cap 16, Sections 273 (1), 256 (3) and 337 of the
Succession Act Cap 268, and Orders 51 rule 6 & 52 rules 1 & 3 of
the Civil Procedure Rules seeking the following orders that; the
Applicant be granted leave to file a final inventory of the Estate of the
late Kafuma Matia, the letters of Administration of the estate of the
late KAFUMA MATIA vide Administration Cause No. 568 of 2018
granted to the Applicants on the 7th day of Febr uary 2019 be
extended or renewed for a reasonable period of time and no order as
to costs.
The Applicants were represented by l earned Counsel Mugendada
Nicholas from M/S Serwadda & Co. Advocates.
The Application is supported by an affidavit deposed by the 2nd
Applicant. In the affidavit in support of the Application, it is shown
that the Applicants were granted Letters of Administration on the 7th
day of February 2019. They secured and accessed quite a number of
the properties left by the deceased and distributed the entire estate
to the rightful beneficiaries but some have not transferred their
2 | Page
shares into their names. That the letters of administration expired
and they are unable file the final inventory . That an extension will
enable them file the final inventory, a draft of which is attached to
the affidavit in support of the application. That it is in the interest of
justice that the application is granted.
In line with section 273 of the Succession Act, the Applicants were
obliged to file an inventory within six months and final accounts
within one year from the date of issuance of the grant. The Applicants
have explained as to why they were unable to take the said step s
within the prescribed time.
Section 337 (2) of the Succession Act Cap 268 stipulates that;
‘A grant of Probate or letters of administration issued by a
court of competent jurisdiction before the 31st day of May
2022, shall remain in force for a period of three years from
the 31st day of May, 2022.’
The present grant having been issued on 7th day of February 2019
expired on 31st May 2025.
Section 337(4) of the Succession Act Cap 268 provides that;
‘The duration of a grant of probate or letters of
administration referred to in subsection (2) may on
Application to court by the administrator or administratrix
of an estate, be extended for a reasonable period determined
by court.’
The Court may, therefo re, extend such grant upon sufficient cause
being shown by the Applicants for a reasonable period of time as may
be determined by the Court. Factors that may constitute sufficient
cause include satisfying the court that the extension is in the best
interest of the beneficiaries to the estate; the Administrator has
complied with the relevant provisions of the law and the conditions
in the grant; and consent has been obtained from all the beneficiaries
under the estate.
3 | Page
In the matter of An Application for e xtension of letters of
Administration granted to Abuno and Others 2025 UGHC 633 (17
July 2025) Wamala J stated that;
‘…In order to grant an extension of time within which to file
the said documents, the court has to be satisfied that; (a) the
Applicants have established sufficient cause for their failure
to act within time; (b) the Applicants are not guilty of dilatory
conduct; and (c) no injustice will be occasioned to any of the
beneficiaries…’
The Applicants have satisfactorily demonstrated sufficient cause for
the extension of the grant. The evidence before Court shows that
substantial steps have already been undertaken in the
administration of the estate, including the securing, access, and
distribution of the estate to the beneficiaries. The delay c omplained
of relates primarily to the completion of the transfer process by some
beneficiaries and the consequent inability to file the final inventory
within the prescribed period.
The Court is satisfied that the delay was neither deliberate nor
occasioned by indifference to the administration process. On the
contrary, the Applicants have shown continued engagement in the
administration of the estate and have exhibited readiness to comply
with their statutory obligations, as evidenced by the draft final
inventory attached to the application. Their conduct does not disclose
dilatory behavior but rather demonstrates an intention to conclude
the administration process in accordance with the law.
Further, the Applicants have demonstrated that consent to the
extension has been obtained from all the beneficiaries under the
estate, which underscores the absence of dispute regarding the
continuation of the administration process.
The Court further finds that no prejudice or injustice is likely to be
occasioned to any beneficiary if the extension is granted. Instead, the
extension would facilitate the proper completion of the
administration process and ensure compliance with the
requirements of the Succession Act regarding the filing of the final
inventory and accounts.
4 | Page
In the premises, the Applicants have satisfactorily demonstrated
sufficient cause and shown that the interests of justice and of the
beneficiaries would be better served by the grant of the extension.
The Application therefore merits the favourable exercise of this
Honourable Court’s discretion.
I therefore find it in the interest of justice that the grant of Letters of
Administration and the time within which to file the inventory and
the final accounts be extended by the Court for a period of two years.
In these premises, the Applicants’ Application succeeds with the
following orders: -
a) Letters of Administration for the Estate of Late KAFUMA MATIA
granted to the Applicants on the 7th day of February 2019 vide
Administrative Cause No. 568 of 2018 are hereby extended for a
period of two years effective 29 May 2026.
b) The time within which to file an inventory and final accounts of
the estate of the late KAFUMA MATIA be extended for the same
period of two years.
c) No order is made as to costs.
I SO ORDER
Dated, signed and delivered electronically this 29th day of May,
2026.
DR. GRACE FLAVIA LAMUNO
AG. JUDGE
29 MAY 2026
Delivered via ECCMIS Under the Judicature (Electronic Filing,
Service and Virtual Proceedings) Rules, 2025.
