
Civil appeal
Deveneaux v Kamara & Anor (SC CIV APP 6 of 2012) [2014] SLSC 3 (10 June 2014)
Deveneaux v Kamara & Anor is a civil appeal from Sierra Leone on 10 June 2014. Cite it as [2014] SLSC 3. Search it by the party names, the citation [2014] SLSC 3, or Sierra Leone civil appeal.
Sierra Leone — Supreme CourtPDF · 106 KB[2014] SLSC 3Civil appeal
June 10, 2014
IN THE SUPREME COURT
Deveneaux
Appellant
v.
Kamara & Anor
Respondent
SC CIV APP 6 of 2012
[2014] SLSC 3
Proceeding. Civil appeal. Sierra Leone.
SC CIV APP NO 6/2012
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF SIERRA LEONE
CIVIL JURISDICTION
BETWEEN:
VICTOR ALPHONSO DEVENEAUX - PLAINTIFF/APPLICANT
AND
JOHN KAMARA - 1 st RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT
MOHAMED KAMARA - 2 n d RESPONDENT/RESPONDENT
CORAM:
HON MR .JUSTICE P. O. HAMILTON - JSC
HON MR JUSTICE V. V. THOMAS - JSC
HON MRS JUSTICE V.A. D WRIGHT - JSC
M P Fofanah Esq for the Appel lant/Applicant
N D Tejan Cole Esq for the Respondent/ Respondent
Ruling Delivered on the
Wright JSC- This is an application on behalf of the
Appellant/Applicant for the following Orders:-
1. That the Appellant/Applicant’s notice o f Civil Appeal dated the
11th June 2012 which was dismissed by this Honourable Court
on the 9th January 2014 be restored pursuant to Rule 103 of the
Supreme Court Rules 1982 (Public Notice No. 1 of 1983).
2. That the Honourable Court enlarges the time within which the
Appellant/Applicant is to file his case based on the grounds of
appeal filed in the said Notice of Civil Appeal pursuant to Rule
41 (b) of the Supreme Court Rules 1982 (Public Notice No 1 of
1982).
The application is supported by the affidavit of Mohamed Pa-Momo
Fofanah sworn to on the 14th January 2014 and the exhibits filed
herein.
At the hearing A B Fofanah Esq. for the Plaintiff/Applicant relied on
the contents of this affidavit dated 14th January 2014 and based his
application under Rule 4(i) (b) of the Supreme Court Rulesl982.
N D. Tejan-Cole Esq for Respondent/Respondent opposed the
application on the ground that the Plaintiff/Applicant did not show
sufficient reason why the application should be granted in that the
Plaintiff/Applicant did not have sufficient funds to file his case at the
relevant time and that his affidavit was defective.
Mohamed Pa-Momoh Fofanah Esq for the Plaintiff/Applicant replied
that the Plaintiff/Applicant made full and frank disclosure of the
facts and that the affidavit was not defective.
In the Civ App 4/2002 between Ibrahim A. N. Basma Applicant and
Adnan Yousef Wansa Respondent and Bassam Ibrahim Basma -
Applicant and Adnan Yousessef Wanza Respondent the Hon Mr
Justice M E Tolla Thompson said “Procedural rules are intended to
serve as hand maiden of justice and not to defeat it, and invoke the
•2-3
courts discretionary power to waive strict application of the rules, in
order to ensure that the parties have a fair opportunity to argue their
case in the Supreme Court.
Having heard the arguments of both sides I grant the application
under Rule 103 of the Supreme Court Rules 1982 in the interest of
justice.
In the circumstances I order that the Appellant/App I icant notice of
appeal dated the 11th June 2012 which was dismissed be restored and
I grant an enlargement of time within which to file thej%|yeil tcftfie
Supreme Court which is seven days from today’s case.
The Plaintiff/Applicant is to pay the Respondent/Respondent cost
assessed at Le2,000,000.
.....................Uv^'h...........................................
HON MRS V.A.D. WRIGHT - JSC
I AGREE
HON MR JUSTICE P.O. HAMILTON- JSC
I AGREE HH
HON JUSTICE V. V. THOMAS - JSC
